Compare funds
HUMN and BOTT share 10 stocks, about 32% of HUMN and 42% of BOTT (29.9% overlap by weight).HUMN leans toward components, actuators and sensors (40% of the fund, vs 19% for BOTT), then robot and humanoid makers (26%).BOTT leans toward robot and humanoid makers (42% of the fund, vs 26% for HUMN), then components, actuators and sensors (19%).
Sub-theme tilt · Robotics and humanoids
Share of each fund in each part of the theme.
At a glance
Expense ratio = the yearly fee, as a share of your money in the fund. The lowest is marked.
| HUMN | BOTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.35%Lowest |
| Yearly cost on $10,000 | $75.00 | $35.00 |
| Holdings | 44 | 31 |
| Top 10 holdings | 40.8% | 53.6% |
| Net assets | $83.0M | $63.4M |
| Holdings as of | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Prospectus filed | Apr 30, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 |
Past returns
Price change plus dividends. “Per year” rows are yearly averages. The highest in each row is in navy.
| HUMN | BOTT | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week | — | — |
| 1 month | — | — |
| 3 months | — | — |
| 6 months | — | — |
| Year to date | — | — |
| 1 year | — | — |
| 3 years, per year | — | — |
| 5 years, per year | — | — |
| Since start of price data, per year | — | — |
Through —. A dash means the fund is younger than the period. Past returns don’t predict future returns.
Shared holdings
Largest first, by the smaller of the funds’ weights.
| Holding | HUMN | BOTT |
|---|---|---|
Tesla IncTSLA | 5.40% | 5.08% |
Leader Harmonious Drive System | 4.23% | 8.83% |
UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd | 5.40% | 4.01% |
Teradyne IncTER | 4.00% | 5.36% |
Rainbow Robotics | 3.27% | 3.59% |
NVIDIA CorpNVDA | 2.67% | 4.54% |
Nabtesco Corp | 2.51% | 2.51% |
Estun Automation Co Ltd | 2.38% | 4.73% |
XPeng IncXPEV | 1.57% | 3.14% |
Shenzhen Zhaowei Machinery & E | 0.69% | 0.23% |
Only in HUMN
34 holdings, 67.2% of the fund.
Only in BOTT
20 holdings, 57.8% of the fund.
How this works & disclosures
Holdings come from each fund’s latest public Form N-PORT on SEC EDGAR (as-of dates in the table), so they can be a few months old.
Expense ratios come from the fee table in each fund’s prospectus (Form 485BPOS) on SEC EDGAR, read from its XBRL data; a dash means it wasn’t machine-readable there, so check the prospectus. Yearly cost on $10,000 is simple arithmetic: expense ratio × $10,000, before any change in the fund’s value.
Returns use Yahoo Finance daily closes (15-min delayed source) adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends are included as if reinvested. 3Y, 5Y and since-start figures are annualized (yearly averages). “Since start” begins on the first day our price source has for the fund; funds that started on different dates aren’t directly comparable. The growth chart is hypothetical, with no taxes or trading costs.
Overlap by weight adds up, for every holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights. Shared stocks are matched by ticker, ISIN, CUSIP or name.
Sub-themes are assigned by Coteau from each company’s main line of business; anything not assigned is in Other. The “leans into” sentences are written from these weights by a fixed template and are not an opinion on the funds.
In Other for HUMN: Swancor Advanced Materials Co 3.5%.
In Other for BOTT: MDA Space Ltd 4.8%.
Data from SEC Form N-PORT, the holdings report funds file with the SEC each quarter; the SEC makes it public about 60 days after the quarter ends. Holdings change; this may be out of date. Coteau describes what funds hold and how they have done; it does not manage money or give advice. Not investment advice. Full disclosures
Data from SEC filings. Holdings change; this may be out of date. Not investment advice. Disclosures
Independent research · Not investment advice · Important disclosures · Contact desk@coteau.app
Coteau Systematic Strategies publishes stock research and model portfolios. Results are hypothetical unless marked Live. Data: Yahoo Finance (15-min delayed), SEC EDGAR and the House Clerk.
Beta 0.9 · Oct 21, 2026