Compare funds
IBOT and HUMN share 10 stocks, about 21% of IBOT and 28% of HUMN (15.5% overlap by weight).IBOT leans toward industrial automation (39% of the fund, vs 8% for HUMN), then chips and chip equipment (26%).HUMN leans toward components, actuators and sensors (40% of the fund, vs 16% for IBOT), then robot and humanoid makers (26%).
Sub-theme tilt · Robotics and humanoids
Share of each fund in each part of the theme.
At a glance
Expense ratio = the yearly fee, as a share of your money in the fund. The lowest is marked.
| IBOT | HUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck Robotics ETF | Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.47%Lowest | 0.75% |
| Yearly cost on $10,000 | $47.00 | $75.00 |
| Holdings | 65 | 44 |
| Top 10 holdings | 39.5% | 40.8% |
| Net assets | $97.9M | $83.0M |
| Holdings as of | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Prospectus filed | Jan 27, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
Past returns
Price change plus dividends. “Per year” rows are yearly averages. The highest in each row is in navy.
| IBOT | HUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week | — | — |
| 1 month | — | — |
| 3 months | — | — |
| 6 months | — | — |
| Year to date | — | — |
| 1 year | — | — |
| 3 years, per year | — | — |
| 5 years, per year | — | — |
| Since start of price data, per year | — | — |
Through —. A dash means the fund is younger than the period. Past returns don’t predict future returns.
Shared holdings
Largest first, by the smaller of the funds’ weights.
| Holding | IBOT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|
ABB Ltd | 5.07% | 2.72% |
NVIDIA CorpNVDA | 4.64% | 2.67% |
Yaskawa Electric Corp | 1.82% | 1.89% |
FANUC Corp | 2.97% | 1.82% |
Hexagon ABHXGBF | 1.61% | 2.64% |
Novanta IncNOVT | 1.48% | 1.73% |
UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd | 1.30% | 5.40% |
Teradyne IncTER | 0.79% | 4.00% |
Ouster IncOUST | 0.69% | 2.74% |
Ambarella IncAMBA | 0.59% | 2.16% |
Only in IBOT
55 holdings, 79.0% of the fund.
Only in HUMN
34 holdings, 71.5% of the fund.
How this works & disclosures
Holdings come from each fund’s latest public Form N-PORT on SEC EDGAR (as-of dates in the table), so they can be a few months old.
Expense ratios come from the fee table in each fund’s prospectus (Form 485BPOS) on SEC EDGAR, read from its XBRL data; a dash means it wasn’t machine-readable there, so check the prospectus. Yearly cost on $10,000 is simple arithmetic: expense ratio × $10,000, before any change in the fund’s value.
Returns use Yahoo Finance daily closes (15-min delayed source) adjusted for dividends and splits, so dividends are included as if reinvested. 3Y, 5Y and since-start figures are annualized (yearly averages). “Since start” begins on the first day our price source has for the fund; funds that started on different dates aren’t directly comparable. The growth chart is hypothetical, with no taxes or trading costs.
Overlap by weight adds up, for every holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights. Shared stocks are matched by ticker, ISIN, CUSIP or name.
Sub-themes are assigned by Coteau from each company’s main line of business; anything not assigned is in Other. The “leans into” sentences are written from these weights by a fixed template and are not an opinion on the funds.
In Other for IBOT: TechnipFMC PLC 2.1%, Imi PLC 1.7%.
In Other for HUMN: Swancor Advanced Materials Co 3.5%.
Data from SEC Form N-PORT, the holdings report funds file with the SEC each quarter; the SEC makes it public about 60 days after the quarter ends. Holdings change; this may be out of date. Coteau describes what funds hold and how they have done; it does not manage money or give advice. Not investment advice. Full disclosures
Data from SEC filings. Holdings change; this may be out of date. Not investment advice. Disclosures
Independent research · Not investment advice · Hypothetical unless marked Live · Data: Yahoo Finance (15-min delayed), SEC EDGAR, House Clerk · Important disclosures · Contact desk@coteau.app
Beta 0.9 · Oct 21, 2026